A quick look at the Greater Houston Area districts headed into Week 8.
Each team’s remaining schedule is listed after their current district record.
13-6A
Willis (5-0) – Caney Creek, OPEN, The Woodlands, Oak Ridge
The Woodlands (5-0) – College Park, Caney Creek, Willis, OPEN
Oak Ridge (3-1) – Cleveland, College Park, Caney Creek, Willis
College Park (3-1) – The Woodlands, Oak Ridge, New Caney, Conroe
New Caney (1-3) – Grand Oaks, Cleveland, College Park, Caney Creek
Caney Creek (1-3) – Willis, The Woodlands, Oak Ridge, New Caney
Conroe (1-4) – OPEN, Grand Oaks, Cleveland, College Park
Grand Oaks (1-4) – New Caney, Conroe, OPEN, Cleveland
Cleveland (0-4) – Oak Ridge, New Caney, Conroe, Grand Oaks
Tony’s take: The district championship should we decided Week 10 when Willis and The Woodlands face off. Given the remaining schedules, I think Oak Ridge is primed to grab the 3rd spot. The Week 9 game Oak Ridge and College Park is a key game for both. The 4th spot should boil down to College Park or New Caney who face off in Week 10.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Willis, 2) The Woodlands, 3) Oak Ridge, 4) New Caney
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 The Woodlands; D1-2 Oak Ridge; D2-1 Willis; D2-2 New Caney
Note: If College Park grabs the final spot over New Caney, they would be D1-2 and Oak Ridge would be D2-2.
14-6A
Westfield (3-0) – Eisenhower, MacArthur, Davis, Aldine
Nimitz (2-1) – Davis, Aldine, Spring, DeKaney
DeKaney (2-1) – Aldine, Spring, MacArthur, Nimitz
Spring (2-1) – MacArthur, DeKaney, Nimitz, Eisenhower
Davis (1-2) – Nimitz, Eisenhower, Westfield, MacArthur
Eisenhower (1-2) – Westfield, Davis, Aldine, Spring
MacArthur (1-2) – Spring, Westfield, DeKaney, Davis
Aldine (0-3) – DeKaney, Nimitz, Eisenhower, Westfield
Tony’s take: Westfield is obviously the prohibitive favorite to take the district title. After that it is a bit of a toss up. But I like the positions of Nimitz, DeKaney and Spring given their remaining schedules. Davis is the team that can upset the apple cart and grab a playoff spot. And the key for the Falcons would be a win this Friday against Nimitz.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Westfield, 2) DeKaney, 3) Nimitz, 4) Spring
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Westfield; D1-2 Spring; D2-1 DeKaney; D2-2 Nimitz
Note: If both Spring and Davis both the playoffs, Westfield would be go D2. If Davis beats Nimitz this week, I would favor Davis to make the playoffs and Nimitz to miss and Spring to still make the playoffs. This outcome would send Westfield D2 and result in D1-1 Spring; D1-2 Davis; D2-1 Westfield: D2-2 DeKaney.
15-6A
Klein Collins (3-0) – Klein Forest, Klein Cain, Tomball, Klein
Tomball (3-0) – Tomball Memorial, Klein Forest, Klein Collins, Klein Cain
Tomball Memorial (2-1) – Tomball, Klein, Klein Oak, Waller
Klein Cain (2-1) – Klein Oak, Klein Collins, Waller, Tomball
Klein Oak (1-2) – Klein Cain, Waller, Tomball Memorial, Klein Forest
Klein Forest (1-2) – Klein Collins, Tomball, Klein, Klein Oak
Klein (0-3) – Waller, Tomball Memorial, Klein Forest, Klein Collins
Waller (0-3) – Klein, Klein Oak, Klein Cain, Tomball Memorial
Tony’s take: The Klein Collin/ Tomball game should decide the district title. I see Klein Collins, Tomball and Tomball Memorial as clear playoff teams. I think the fourth playoff spot boils down to Klein Cain or Klein Oak who face off this Friday.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Klein Collins, 2) Tomball Memorial, 3) Tomball, 4) Klein Cain
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Klein Collins; D1-2 Klein Cain; D2-1 Tomball Memorial; D2-2 Tomball
Note: If Klein Oak replaces Klein Cain as the 4th playoff team they go into the D1-2 slot with all else remaining the same.
16-6A
Cy Springs (3-0) – Langham Creek, Cy Falls, Cy Woods, Bridgeland
Bridgeland (3-0) – Cy Ranch, Cy Woods, Cy Lakes, Cy Springs
Cy Falls (2-1) – Cy Woods, Cy Springs, Cy Park, Cy Ranch
Cy Ranch (2-1) – Bridgeland, Cy Lakes, Langham, Cy Falls
Cy Woods (2-1) – Cy Falls, Bridgeland, Cy Springs, Cy Parks
Langham Creek (0-3) – Cy Springs, Cy Park, Cy Ranch, Cy Lakes
Cy Lakes (0-3) – Cy Park, Cy Ranch, Bridgeland, Langham Creek
Cy Park (0-3) – Cy Lakes, Langham Creek, Cy Falls, Cy Woods
Tony’s take: Last year this district went into Week 11 with 6 teams in the playoff race and wound up with a 4-way tie for 1st. This year looks a lot cleaner with 5 teams competing for the four spots. This week’s Saturday games could play a big role in setting the district. Cy Woods needs a win over Cy Falls to stay in playoff race. The Bridgeland/ Cy Ranch game could go a long way in determining the district title.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Bridgeland, 2) Cy Falls, 3) Cy Springs, 4) Cy Ranch
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Bridgeland; D1-2 Cy Ranch; D2-1 Cy Falls; D2-2 Cy Springs
Notes: There are several very close games the remainder of the season and the order of finish could get jumbled up a bit. I could see Cy Woods making the playoffs over Cy Ranch, Cy Springs or Cy Ranch but that needs to start with a Cy Woods win this Saturday. A loss and I thin Cy Woods is out of the playoff race barring multiple upsets the final three weeks.
17-6A
Cy Fair (3-0) – Northbrook, Spring Woods, Cy Ridge, Memorial
Memorial (3-0) – Cy Ridge, Jersey Village, Stratford, Cy Fair
Stratford (2-1) – Spring Woods, Cy Ridge, Memorial, Jersey Village
Jersey Village (2-1) – Cy Creek, Memorial, Northbrook, Stratford
Cy Ridge (2-1) – Memorial, Stratford, Cy Fair, Cy Creek
Spring Woods (0-3) – Stratford, Cy Fair, Cy Creek, Northbrook
Cy Creek (0-3) – Jersey Village, Northbrook, Spring Woods, Cy Ridge
Northbrook (0-3) – Cy Fair, Cy Creek, Jersey Village, Spring Woods
Tony’s take: Given the remaining schedules, I think the four playoff teams a pretty clear in this district with only the order of finish behind Cy Fair somewhat up in the air.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Cy Fair, 2) Stratford, 3) Jersey Village, 4) Memorial
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Cy Fair; D1-2 Jersey Village; D2-1 Stratford; D2-2 Memorial
Notes: I think the only think that possibly change on this is the D2 seeding with Memorial and Stratford swapping spot but I think that is a long shot.
18-6A
Lamar (3-0) – Sam Houston, Chavez, OPEN, Bellaire
Westbury (2-1) – Bellaire, Heights, Westside, OPEN
Heights (1-1) – Westside, Westbury, Sam Houston, Chavez
Sam Houston (1-1) – Lamar, Bellaire, Heights, Westside
Bellaire (1-1) – Westbury, Sam Houston, Chavez, Lamar
Westside (1-2) – Heights, OPEN, Westbury, Sam Houston
Chavez (0-3) – OPEN, Lamar, Bellaire, Heights
Tony’s take: I see Lamar, Heights and Westbury as clear playoff teams. The fourth playoff spot should boil down to Bellaire, Sam Houston or Westside.
Tony’s projected finish:1) Lamar, 2) Heights, 3) Westbury, 4) Bellaire
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Lamar; D1-2 Bellaire; D2-1 Heights; D2-Westbury
Note: If either Sam Houston or Westside make the playoffs over Bellaire, they would go into the D1-2 slot with no other changes.
19-6A
Katy (5-0) – OPEN, Cinco Ranch, Seven Lakes, Taylor
Jordan (3-1) – Seven Lakes, Taylor, Tompkins, Morton Ranch
Taylor (3-1) – Mayde Creek, Jordan, Paetow, Katy
Cinco Ranch (3-2) – Paetow, Katy, OPEN, Seven Lakes
Tompkins (2-2) – Morton Ranch, Mayde Creek, Jordan, Paetow
Mayde Creek (2-3) – Taylor, Tompkins, Morton Ranch, OPEN
Seven Lakes (1-3) – Jordan, Paetow, Katy, Cinco Ranch
Morton Ranch (1-4) – Tompkins, OPEN, Mayde Creek, Jordan
Paetow (0-4) – Cinco Ranch, Seven Lakes, Taylor, Tompkins
Tony’s Take: Katy and Jordan seem like playoff looks at this point. Taylor, Cinco Ranch and Tompkins are competing for the final two playoff spots in my opinion.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Katy, 2) Jordan, 3) Tompkins, 4) Taylor
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Katy: D1-2 Tompkins; D2-1 Jordan; D2-2 Taylor
Note: I have this projected as 3-way tie for 3rd between Tompkins, Taylor and Cinco Ranch. In that scenario Tompkins and Taylor would be the playoff teams. If Taylor an loss in games where I have team as very slight favorites (Mayde Creek with Friday and Paetow Week 10) and all else goes as I have projected Cinco Ranch would finish 3rd and Tompkins 4th and those two would be the D1 teams. In that scenario Katy goes D2 with the seedings being D1-1 Cinco Ranch; D1-2 Tompkins; D2-1 Katy, D2-2 Jordan.
20-6A
Ridge Point (5-0) – Clements, Austin, Travis, OPEN
George Ranch (4-1) – Hightower, Dulles, OPEN, Elkins
Hightower (3-1) – George Ranch, Elkins, Clements, Austin
Austin (3-1) – Travis, Ridge Point, Bush, Hightower
Travis (3-2) – Austin, OPEN, Ridge Point, Bush
Clements (1-3) – Ridge Point, Bush, Hightower, Dulles
Dulles (1-4) – OPEN, George Ranch, Elkins, Clements
Elkins (0-4) – Bush, Hightower, Dulles, George Ranch
Bush (0-4) – Elkins, Clements, Austin, Travis
Tony’s Take: I think the top 3 are locked in with the fourth spot to be decided with Saturday with Travis and Austin play.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Ridge Point, 2) Hightower, 3) George Ranch, 4) Travis
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Ridge Point; D1-2 Travis; D2-1 Hightower, D2-2 George Ranch
Note: If Austin were to grab the fourth spot over Travis, George Ranch would move to the D1-2 seed and Austin would take the D2-2 slot.
21-6A
North Shore (3-0) – West Brook, Humble, Atascocita, Kingwood
Atascocita (3-0) – Humble, King, North Shore, Summer Creek
Summer Creek (2-1) – Kingwood, United, King, Atascocita
CE King (2-1) – United, Atascocita, Summer Creek, West Brook
Humble (1-2) – Atascocita, North Shore, Kingwood, United
Kingwood (1-2) – Summer Creek, West Brook, Humble, North Shore
Beaumont United (0-3) – King, Summer Creek, West Brook, Humble
West Brook (0-3) – North Shore, Kingwood, United, King
Tony’s Take: I think the top 4 are locked in with the only thing left to be determined is the order of finish to be determined Week 10 when North Short plays Atascocita and Summer Creek plays King.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) North Shore, 2) Atascocita, 3) Summer Creek 4) King
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 North Shore; D1-2 Atascocita; D2-1 Summer Creek; D2-2 King
Note: The outcome of the Week 10 games will not change the D1 and D2 teams just the seeding within the divisions.
22-6A
Dobie (3-0) – Channelview, Rayburn, South Houston, OPEN
Channelview (2-0) – Dobie, Deer Park, Pasadena, Pasadena Memorial
Pasadena Memorial (2-1) – Deer Park, Pasadena, OPEN, Channelview
Deer Park (1-1) – Pasadena Memorial, Channelview, Sam Rayburn, South Houston
South Houston (1-2) – Rayburn, OPEN, Dobie, Deer Park
Rayburn (0-2) – South Houston, Dobie, Deer Park, Pasadena
Pasadena (0-3) – OPEN, Pasadena Memorial, Channelview, Rayburn
Tony’s Take: I think the four playoff teams will be Dobie, Deer Park, Pasadena Memorial and Channelview with the only think to be determined being the order of finish between Pasadena Memorial and Channelview when they play Week 11.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Dobie, 2) Deer Park, 3) Pasadena Memorial, 4) Channelview
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Dobie; D1-2 Deer Park; D2-1 Pasadena Memorial; D2-2 Channelview
Note: if Channelview beats Memorial Week 11 the D2 seedings would flop.
23-6A
Pearland (3-0) – Dawson, Taylor, Strake Jesuit, Hastings
Dawson (3-0) – Pearland, Shadow Creek, Elsik, Alvin
Shadow Creek (2-1) – Alvin, Dawson, Taylor, Strake Jesuit
Alief Taylor (2-1) – Strake Jesuit, Pearland, Shadow Creek, Elsik
Alief Elsik (1-2) – Hastings, Alvin, Dawson, Taylor
Strake Jesuit (1-2) – Taylor, Hastings, Pearland, Shadow Creek
Alvin (0-3) – Shadow Creek, Elsik, Hastings, Dawson
Alief Hastings (0-3) – Elsik, Strake Jesuit, Alvin, Pearland
Tony’s Take: I have the top 3 teams as Pearland, Dawson and Shadow Creek with the 4th playoff spot up for grabs between Taylor, Hastings and Strake Jesuit. The order of finish between Dawson and Shadow Creek is likely to determined when the play next week.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Pearland, 2) Shadow Creek, 3) Dawson, 4) Alief Taylor
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Pearland; D1-2 Alief Taylor; D2-1 Shadow Creek; D2-Dawson
Note: There is a lot up in the air in 236A. I think either Dawson or Shadow Creek could finish 2nd with the other finishing 3rd. If Dawson finishes 2nd, swap the D2 seedings. And I think any of Taylor, Elkins or Jesuit could finish 4th. Whoever finishes 4th will be the D1-2 seed.
24-6A
Dickinson (2-0) – Brazoswood, Clear Lake, Clear Creek, Clear Brook
Clear Creek (2-0) – Clear Brook, Clear Springs, Dickinson, Clear Falls
Clear Falls (2-1) – OPEN, Brazoswood, Clear Lake, Clear Creek
Clear Brook (2-1) – Clear Creek, OPEN, Clear Springs, Dickinson
Clear Springs (1-2) – Clear Lake, Clear Creek, Clear Brook
Clear Lake (0-2) – Clear Springs, Dickinson, Clear Falls, Brazoswood
Brazoswood (0-3) – Dickinson, Clear Falls, OPEN, Clear Lake
Tony’s take: I will very confident in Dickinson, Clear Falls and Clear Springs as the top three teams. And this week’s Clear Brook/ Clear Creek game should sort out 4th.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Dickinson, 2) Clear Falls, 3) Clear Springs, 4) Clear Creek
Tony’s projected seedings: D1-1 Dickinson; D1-2 Clear Springs; D2-1 Clear Falls, D2-2 Clear Creek
Note: If Clear Brook grabs the 4th spot over Clear Creek they would be the D2-2 seed.
8-5AD1
Port Arthur Memorial (4-0) – Goose Creek Memorial, Lee, Hill, Kingwood Park
Barbers Hill (4-1) – OPEN, Kingwood Park, Port Arthur Memorial, Porter
La Porte (4-1) – Porter, Sterling, Crosby, OPEN
New Caney Porter (3-1) – La Porte, Goose Creek Memorial, Lee, Barbers Hill
Kingwood Park (3-2) – Lee, Barbers Hill, OPEN, Port Arthur Memorial
Baytown Lee (2-2) – Kingwood Park, Port Arthur Memorial, Porter, Sterling
Baytown Sterling (0-4) – Crosby, La Porte, Goose Creek Memorial, Lee
Goose Creek Memorial (0-4) – Port Arthur Memorial, Porter, Sterling, Crosby
Crosby (0-5) – Sterling, OPEN, La Porte, Goose Creek Memorial
Tony’s take: I think the four teams are likely to be Port Arthur Memorial, Barbers Hill, La Porte and Porter. La Porte beat Barbers Hill in Week 5, so they have and advantage in tiebreakers against Barbers Hill. Porter has a Week 3 win over Kingwood Park, so they have an advantage in tie breakers over Kingwood Park.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Port Arthur Memorial, 2) La Porte, 3) Barbers Hill, 4) Porter
Note: This district matches up against 7-5AD1 in the opening round of the playoffs. 7-5AD1 is a DFW/ East Texas based district. The top two finishers will get a home game while the 3rd and 4th place teams will have to travel to DFW or East Texas for a 1st round matchup. The likely top two teams in 7-5AD1 are Longview and Forney. Barbers Hill would be looking at trips of 211 miles or 267 miles. Porter would be looking at trips of 192 miles or 227 miles. So, you see how important grabbing a top 2 seed is.
9-5AD1
Galveston Ball (4-0) – Milby, Waltrip, Northside, Wisdom
Houston Wisdom (4-1) – OPEN, Madison, Sterling, Ball
Houston Madison (4-1) – Northside, Wisdom, OPEN, Sterling
Houston Sterling (3-1) – Waltrip, Northside, Wisdom, Madison
Houston Waltrip (3-1) – Sterling, Ball, Sharpstown, Austin
Houston Milby (1-4) – Ball, Sharpstown, Austin
Houston Austin (1-4) – Sharpstown, OPEN, Milby, Waltrip
Houston Northside (0-4) – Madison, Sterling, Ball, Sharpstown
Houston Sharpstown (0-4) – Austin, Milby, Waltrip, Northside
Tony’s take: I see the four playoff teams as likely Ball, Madison, Sterling and Waltrip but the order behind Ball as very much up in the air.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Ball, 2) Sterling, 3) Madison, 4) Waltrip
Note: The order behind Ball could wind up in any order and don’t completely count Wisdom out of the picture but they would need multiple upsets for that to happen.
10-5AD1
Fulshear (4-0) – Magnolia West, Kempner, Manvel, Foster
Magnolia (4-1) – Kempner, Manvel, Foster, OPEN
Magnolia West (3-1) – Fulshear, Terry, Angleton, Friendswood
Angleton (3-2) – OPEN, Friendswood, Magnolia West, Kempner
Manvel (2-2) – Foster, Magnolia, Fulshear, Terry
Friendswood (2-3) – Terry, Angleton, OPEN, Magnolia West
Rosenberg Terry (1-3) – Friendswood, Magnolia West, Kempner, Manvel
Richmond Foster (1-4) – Manvel, OPEN, Magnolia, Fulshear
Fort Bend Kempner (0-4) – Magnolia, Fulshear, Terry, Angleton
Tony’s take: I think the top four right now are the four playoff teams. The order behind Fulshear is still up in the air.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Fulshear, 2) Magnolia, 3) Angleton, 4) Magnolia West
Note: Manvel has already lost to Angleton and Magnolia West the teams they would be likely to compete against for the fourth spot.
9-5AD2
Port Neches Groves (3-0) – Dayton, Santa Fe, Nederland, Galena Park
Nederland (3-0) – FB Marshall, Galena Park, PNG, Texas City
Texas City (2-1) – Willowridge, Dayton, Santa Fe, Nederland
Dayton (2-1) – PNG, Texas City, Willowridge, FB Marshall
Fort Bend Marshall (1-2) – Nederland, Willowridge, Galen Park, Dayton
Galena Park (1-2) – Santa Fe, Nederland, FB Marshall, PNG
Santa Fe (0-3) – Galena Park, PNG, Texas City, Willowridge
Fort Bend Willowridge (0-3) – Texas City, FB Marshall, Dayton, Santa Fe
Tony’s take: I think the top four teams are clearly PNG, Texas City, Fort Bend Marshall and Nederland.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Port Neches-Groves, 2) Texas City, 3) Fort Bend Marshall, 4) Nederland
Note: Nederland’s Week 6 win over Dayton gives them a big advantage over Dayton.
10-5AD2
Montgomery Lake Creek (3-0) – Rudder, Huntsville, OPEN, Brenham
Huntsville (3-0) – OPEN, Lake Creek, Brenham, Randle
Richmond Randle (1-1) – Montgomery, Lamar Consolidated, Rudder, Huntsville
Brenham (1-1) – Lamar Consolidated, Rudder, Huntsville, Lake Creek
Bryan Rudder (1-1) – Lake Creek, Brenham, Randle, Montgomery
Lamar Consolidated (0-3) – Brenham, Randle, Montgomery, OPEN
Montgomery (0-3) – Randle, OPEN, Lamar Consolidated, Rudder
Tony’s take: I think Lake Creek and Randle are clearly 1, 2 in the district. The last two spots come down to Huntsville, Brenham or Rudder. Huntsville should need only 1 win to clinch the playoffs and I think they get that win. The Brenham/ Rudder game Week 9 will be key to determining the 4th spot.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Lake Creek, 2) Randle, 3) Huntsville, 4) Brenham
10-4AD1
Lumberton (1-0) – Vidor, Huffman Hargrave, LCM, Livingston
Little Cypress-Mauriceville (1-0) – Livingston, Splendora, Lumberton, Huffman Hargrave
Livingston (1-0) – LCM, Vidor, Splendora, Lumberton
Vidor (0-1) – Lumberton, Livingston, Huffman Hargrave, Splendora
Splendora (0-1) – Huffman Hargrave, LCM, Livingston, Vidor
Huffman Hargrave (0-1) – Splendora, Lumberton, Vidor, LCM
Tony’s take: Only one week of completed play in this small district so a lot can still happen here.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Lumberton, 2) LCM, 3) Vidor, 4) Livingston
11-4AD1
Houston Yates (3-0) – Kashmere, Washington, Wheatley, Worthing
Houston Worthing (3-0) – North Forest, Furr, Washington, Yates
Houston North Forest (2-1) – Worthing, Scarborough, Kashmere, Wheatley
Houston Kashmere (2-1) – Yates, Wheatley, North Forest, Furr
Houston Furr (1-2) – Washington, Worthing, Scarborough, Kashmere
Houston Wheatley (1-2) – Scarborough, Kashmere, Yates, North Forest
Houston Scarborough (0-3) – Wheatley, North Forest, Furr, Washington
Houston Washington (0-3) – Furr, Yates, Worthing, Scarborough
Tony’s take: There’s a lot of close games left to be played in this district and lot left to sort out.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Yates, 2) Worthing, 3) North Forest, 4) Furr
Note: Don’t count out Kashmere for the fourth spot.
12-4AD1
Needville (3-0) – El Campo, Bay City, OPEN, Iowa Colony
Iowa Colony (2-0) – Navasota, El Campo, Bay City, Needville
Bay City (2-1) – OPEN, Needville, Iowa Colony, Stafford
El Campo (1-1) – Needville, Iowa Colony, Stafford, Brazosport
Navasota (1-2) – Iowa Colony, Stafford, Brazosport, OPEN
Stafford (0-2) – Brazosport, Navasota, El Campo, Bay City
Brazosport (0-3) – Stafford, OPEN, Navasota, El Campo
Tony’s take: Iowa Colony’s 3rd year program is making waves and I like them to keep it though they have a several potentially close games remaining. I see El Campo and Needville finishing 2nd and 3rd. I see Bay City as 4th.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Iowa Colony, 2) El Campo, 3) Needville, 4) Bay City
Note: Don’t count out Navasota or Stafford as having a shot at the 4th spot.
9-4AD2
Hamshire-Fannett (3-0) – Hardin-Jefferson, Silsbee, Liberty, OPEN
Silsbee (2-0) – Liberty, Hamshire-Fannett, Bridge City, Jasper
Jasper (2-1) – OPEN, WOS, Hardin-Jefferson, Silsbee
West Orange-Stark (1-2) – Bridge City, Jasper, OPEN, Hardin-Jefferson
Liberty (1-2) – Silsbee, OPEN, Hamshire-Fannett, Bridge City
Bridge City (0-2) – WOS, Hardin-Jefferson, Silsbee, Liberty
Hardin-Jefferson (0-2) – Hamshire-Fannett, Bridge City, Jasper, WOS
Tony’s take: The district title should be decided between Hamshire-Fannett and Silsbee Week 9. Third and fourth should be decided between Jasper and West Orange-Stark Week 9.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Silsbee, 2) Hamshire-Fannett, 3) Jasper, 4) West Orange-Stark
Note: It would take a series of upsets for anyone other than those four to grab a playoff berth.
10-4AD2
Bellville (3-0) – Sealy, OPEN, Wharton, Sweeny
Sweeny (2-0) – Columbia, Royal, Sealy, Bellville
Columbia (2-1) – Sweeny, La Marque, OPEN, Royal
Royal (1-1) – Wharton, Sweeny, La Marque, Columbia
La Marque (1-2) – OPEN, Columbia, Royal, Sealy
Sealy (0-2) – Bellville, Wharton, Sweeny, La Marque
Wharton (0-3) – Royal, Sealy, Bellville, OPEN
Tony’s take: Bellville remains the district favorite (and a legitimate State contender). 2nd should be settled between Sweeny and Royal Week 9. Columbia has the inside track on the 4th spot.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Bellville, 2) Sweeny, 3) Royal 4) Royal
Note: The team I have projected 5th (Sealy) has already lost to Columbia (Week 5) and will need multiple upsets to make the playoffs.
10-3AD1
Orangefield (3-0) – Hardin, OPEN, Kirbyville, East Chambers
Anahuac (2-1) – East Chambers, Buna, OPEN, Tarkington
Kirbyville (2-1) – Anahuac, Hardin, Orangefield, OPEN
East Chambers (1-1) – Anahuac, Tarkington, Hardin, Orangefield
Tarkington (1-1) – Kirbyville, East Chambers, Buna, Anahuac
Hardin (0-2) – Orangefield, Kirbyville, East Chambers, Buna
Buna (0-3) – OPEN, Anahuac, Tarkington, Hardin
Tony’s take: Orangefield, Anahuac and Kirbyville are the clear 1, 2, 3 with the order still to be determined and a 3-way tie for first a possibility. The 4th playoff spot should be decided between East Chamber and Tarkington Week 9.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Orangefield, 2) Anahuac, 3) Kirbyville, 4) East Chambers
Note: If Kirbyville beats Orangefield Week 10, a 3-way tie for 1st is possible.
12-3AD1
Columbus (1-0) – Hitchcock, Yoakum, OPEN, Hempstead
Hitchcock (1-0) – Columbus, Hempstead, Hallettsville, OPEN
Hempstead (0-0) – Hallettsville, Hitchcock, Yoakum, Columbus
Hallettsville (0-1) – Hempstead, OPEN, Hitchcock, Yoakum
Yoakum (0-1) – OPEN, Columbus, Hempstead, Hallettsville
Tony’s take: Columbus and Hitchcock are both State ranked and both legitimate title contenders.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Hitchcock, 2) Columbus, 3) Hallettsville, 4) Yoakum
Note: The game this week between Columbus and Hitchcock should determine 1st and 2nd. The Week 11 game between Yoakum and Hallettsville should settle 3rd and 4th.
14-3AD2
Tidehaven (2-0) – Brazos, Danbury, Boling, Van Vleck
Boling (2-0) – Rice, East Bernard, Tidehaven, Brazos
Van Vleck (2-1) – OPEN, Rice, East Bernard, Tidehaven
East Bernard (1-1) – Danbury, Boling, Van Vleck, Rice
Wallis Brazos (1-2) – Tidehaven, OPEN, Danbury, Boling
Rice Consolidated (1-2) – Boling, Van Vleck, OPEN, East Bernard
Danbury (0-3) – East Bernard, Tidehaven, Brazos, OPEN
Tony’s take: I think Tidehaven, East Bernard and Boling will finish 1, 2, 3 in some order. Van Vleck, Brazos and Rice Consolidated should compete for the final spot.
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Tidehaven, 2) East Bernard, 3) Boling, 4) Brazos
Note: Don’t count out Rice Consolidated or Van Vleck for the 4th spot.
NOTE ON TAPPS: Most of the teams make the playoffs so the order of finish primarily determines placement in the bracket.
TAPPS 2-D1 (All Five in Playoffs)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) St. Thomas, 2) Antonian Prep, 3) SA Central Catholic, 4) Tomball Concordia Lutheran, 5) St. Pius X
TAPPS 4-D2 (Four of Six in Playoffs)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Houston Second Baptist, 2) Fort Bend Christian, 3) The Woodlands Christian, 4) Houston Lutheran South, 5) Beaumont Kelly, 6) Katy St. John XXII
TAPPS 4-D3 (Three of Four in Playoffs)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Cypress Community Christian, 2) Austin Brentwood, 3) Bay Area Christian, 4) Magnolia Legacy
TAPPS 3-D4 (All Three in Playoffs)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Northland Christian, 2) Bryan Brazos Christian, 3) Tomball Rosehill
SPC 4A (Top Two Teams Meet for Championship Week 11)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Houston St. John’s, 2) Bellaire Episcopal, 3) Kinkaid, 4) Episcopal School of Dallas, 5) Dallas St. Mark’s
SPC 3A (Top Two Teams Meet for Championship Week 11)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Houston Christian, 2) Fort Worth Trinity Valley, 3) The Woodlands John Cooper, 4) Fort Worth Country Day, 5) Irving Cistercian, 6) Arlington Oakridge, 7) Dallas Greenhill Prep
TAPPS Six-man 2-D1 (All Five in Playoffs)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Emery-Weiner, 2) Giddings Lone Star, 3) Saint Mary’s Hall, 4) Sugar Land Logos Prep, 5) Laredo St. Augustine
TAPPS Six-man 5-D2 (Four of Six in Playoffs)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Pasadena First Baptist, 2) Conroe Covenant, 3) Bryan Allen Academy, 4) Westbury Christian, 5) Beaumont Legacy, 6) Katy Faith West
TAPPS Six-man 5-D3 (Four of Six in Playoffs)
Tony’s projected finish: 1) Bryan St. Joseph, 2) Brazosport Christian, 3) Baytown Christian, 4) Divine Savior, 5) Spring Founders Christian, 6) Houston Second Baptist UM
txhsfb.net 
Leave a comment